← Search

Brandon Stovall

ENGLEWOOD, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
244 matches · 169W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brandon Stovall to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history244 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Robert White championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-14 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yurii Land
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-30 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 0-6, 1-0
W
Scott Kempton / Neil Nowak
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Ungar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7
W
Mark Price / Rich Pavcek
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Scott Ungar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Ungar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Scott Ungar championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-06-02 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-26 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ben Huber
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-05 · LTFC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alec Wynne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-21 · LTFC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sean Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-14 · LTFC BLUE · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeremy Robbins
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
85.3%
29W–5L · 68.4% of games
3.5
74%
77W–27L · 58.8% of games
6.0mixed
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.5% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
21W–14L · 55.3% of games
7.5mixed
68.8%
11W–5L · 55.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 32% of the time
#1 Doubles
32%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
63 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
49 matches
#1 Male Singles
8%
19 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
7%
16 matches
#1 Singles
6%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer