← Search

Jane Schmelzle

FORT COLLINS, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
121 matches · 78W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jane Schmelzle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history121 matches
W
2026-08-19 · FCCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Molly Hudson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-16 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Roeder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-12 · FCCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Camp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-05 · FCCC NAVY · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-02 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Roeder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-30 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Raghu Raj Prasanna Kumar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · FCCC WHITE · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matt Morgan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-22 · FCCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tahni Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · FCCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Whitney Irvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · FCCC BLUE · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kiley Hupp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · FCCC SILVER · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-11 · FCCC SILVER · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 67.7% of games
3.0
64.3%
18W–10L · 54.5% of games
3.5
60.4%
32W–21L · 53.4% of games
6.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 65.9% of games
6.5mixed
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.2% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
52 matches
#1 Singles
34%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
9%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
10 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King