← Search

Tahni Clay

Fort Collins, CO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
186 matches · 106W–80L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tahni Clay to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history186 matches
W
2026-08-26 · FCCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Gronewoller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-05 · FCCC NAVY · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-29 · FCCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-22 · FCCC NAVY · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Schmelzle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · FCCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-10 · FCCC RED · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aileen VanMeveren
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-09 · FCCC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Weller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
Rachel White / Melissa King
2026-07-02 · FCCC SILVER · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-06-11 · FCCC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-04 · FCCC SILVER · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Clay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-03 · FCCC WHITE · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-05-28 · FCCC BLUE · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Olsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.5
61.1%
88W–56L · 54.4% of games
7.0
50%
7W–7L · 48.2% of games
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 63.6% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
38%
70 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
34 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer