← Search

Josh Spink

Gainesville, FL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
315 matches · 186W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Josh Spink to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history315 matches
W
2026-07-30 · 300/Pauly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alison Andrus mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-24 · 300/Pauly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Julie Sager mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-19 · 300/Pauly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jenny Neelands mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · 300/Wimsett-Spink 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with MARY K WIMSETT mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-27 · 300/Wimsett-Spink 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ashley Chalouhi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-07 · JTC Spink · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gary Wimsett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-3
L
2026-05-29 · JTC Spink · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Corey Sobers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-15 · JTC Spink · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Freddie Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-03 · JTC Spink · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Duffaut
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-19 · JTC Spink · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Don Monk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
W
2026-03-25 · 300 Wimsett/Spink · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with MARY K WIMSETT mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-13 · JTC Porter · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Dolsberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams64 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
0.0
33.3%
3W–6L · 50.6% of games
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
78.6%
22W–6L · 64.5% of games
3.5
51.4%
19W–18L · 51.1% of games
4.0
47.4%
18W–20L · 49.9% of games
5.5
77.8%
7W–2L · 62% of games
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.4% of games
6.5
66.7%
10W–5L · 56.9% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 53.1% of games
8.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 58.1% of games
2.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 63% of games
6.0mixed
89.5%
17W–2L · 68.5% of games
7.0mixed
53.3%
16W–14L · 53.5% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
9W–18L · 45% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
96 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
86 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
70 matches
#1 Singles
11%
35 matches
#1 Male Singles
4%
13 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert