← Search

MARY K WIMSETT

Gainesville, FL
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
157 matches · 82W–75L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add MARY K WIMSETT to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history157 matches
L
2026-09-12 · 300/Wimsett-Dickerson · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Cindi Harvey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-22 · 300/Wimsett-Spink 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rupen Shah mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Heather Mears championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Heather Mears championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-13 · 300/Wimsett-Gerber 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jonathan Taffe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
Tiffany Schmidt / Brian Kim
2026-07-09 · 300/Wimsett-Gerber 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Stefan Gerber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-07-05 · 300/Wimsett-Spink 7.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Josh Spink mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-21 · #3 Doubles · with Jonathan Taffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Dennis ILAGAN / Narong Khan
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Jonathan Taffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Jonathan Taffe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · 300 Club Wimsett · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Burns
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
100%
13W–0L · 80.2% of games
3.0
47.4%
18W–20L · 50.4% of games
3.5
22.2%
2W–7L · 34.7% of games
5.5
40%
6W–9L · 45.6% of games
6.5
40%
4W–6L · 41.4% of games
5.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 49.1% of games
6.0mixed
53.8%
14W–12L · 52.9% of games
7.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 51.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
30 matches
#4 Doubles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova