← Search

Brandi Goldapp

Valley, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
220 matches · 145W–75L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brandi Goldapp to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history220 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Goldapp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Haley Cruise
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
Tory Jorgensen / Jo Lehan
2026-08-26 · Goldapp · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bridget Mckeegan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-19 · Goldapp · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lainie Fanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-17 · Goldapp/Kephart · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with LiQin Kephart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Goldapp · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Samantha Wahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Kephart/Goldapp · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Garret Starman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-20 · NE/Kephart/Erwin/18&Over7.0X · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sri Vijay Yellepeddi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · Kephart/Goldapp · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cayden Brandner Stanton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Goldapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Wahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-26 · Kephart/Goldapp · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Garret Starman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-23 · Goldapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samantha Wahl
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-19 · Kephart/Goldapp · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Garret Starman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
87.5%
14W–2L · 64.4% of games
3.0
73.7%
14W–5L · 59.1% of games
3.5
77.4%
41W–12L · 59.9% of games
4.0
40%
14W–21L · 47.2% of games
7.0
90%
9W–1L · 65.2% of games
8.0
75%
3W–1L · 60.8% of games
6.0mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 62.1% of games
7.0mixed
61.8%
21W–13L · 52.4% of games
8.0mixed
54.5%
18W–15L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
88 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
75 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
50 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova