← Search

Heather Siebken

Omaha, NE
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
144 matches · 72W–72L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Heather Siebken to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history144 matches
L
Jo Lehan / Cynthia Waldrop
2026-09-02 · Obermier · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Studts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-31 · Simmonds/Siebken · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Mciver
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-08-26 · Obermier · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Studts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Obermier · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Simmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-10 · Simmonds/Siebken · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Simmonds
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-29 · Obermier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alex Arnett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-06-30 · Goldapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Schmaderer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-23 · Goldapp · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Schmaderer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-07 · Obermier · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Alex Arnett mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-19 · Goldapp · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Schmaderer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-05-05 · Goldapp · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Renee Welch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · Mixed Doubles on the Rocks · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Peter Anaradian mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.9% of games
3.0
53.3%
16W–14L · 51% of games
3.5
50%
20W–20L · 50.8% of games
4.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 43.9% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
45.5%
15W–18L · 45.9% of games
8.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
46 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
33 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King