← Search

Jana Lindover

Old Westbury, NY
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 106W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jana Lindover to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Jasmine Harris Khalil championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Emma Brandt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-07-08 · LI: HIT/Roslyn, Kleinberg/Imberman · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tracy Kleinberg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
N/A
2026-07-07 · Roslyn, Imberman/Walsh · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jane Walsh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · LI: HIT/Roslyn, Kleinberg/Imberman · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · Roslyn, Imberman/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Simone Crames
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-4
W
2026-05-19 · Roslyn, Imberman/Walsh · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-05-12 · Roslyn, Imberman/Walsh · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-6
L
2026-05-05 · Roslyn, Imberman/Walsh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joan Valenti
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-19 · ST PW, Imberman/Walsh · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Berg
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
76.1%
35W–11L · 57.8% of games
4.0
77.3%
51W–15L · 57.7% of games
4.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 43.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#1 Singles
21%
31 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#2 Singles
11%
17 matches
#4 Doubles
7%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova