← Search

Barghav Hariharan

Centreville, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
104 matches · 61W–43L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Barghav Hariharan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history104 matches
W
2026-08-14 · Team 1 Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Morris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-5
L
2026-07-30 · Team 1 Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Samuel J Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-17 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas Cyrnak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-1
W
2026-05-07 · Team 2 Torres · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Daniel Bernal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · Team 2 Always Causing A Racquet · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jose Torres
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-02 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas Cyrnak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-4
L
2026-04-26 · Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas Cyrnak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-5
W
2026-04-25 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Luis Giraldo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Thomas Cyrnak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-5
L
2026-03-07 · Team 4 String Theory · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kristina Heino mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-2
W
2026-01-11 · Team 4 String Theory · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Annie Richardson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-3
W
William Wray / Yue She
2025-10-16 · Team 1 Net Assets · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Quentin Carter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
4.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 56.3% of games
4.5
62.1%
18W–11L · 58.4% of games
5.0
25%
1W–3L · 41.5% of games
8.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 54.1% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
66.7%
8W–4L · 52.7% of games
8.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 54.5% of games
9.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 45.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
25 matches
#1 Singles
5%
5 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer