← Search

Beth Lynch

Pittsburgh, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
113 matches · 63W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Beth Lynch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history113 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Glen Creek Level Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Glen Creek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · Glen Creek Level Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · Glen Creek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Meredith Irwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · Glen Creek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · Glen Creek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-11-23 · Crosstown Connection · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jonathan Meyn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-22 · Crosstown Connection · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Puhalla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-11-16 · Crosstown Connection · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zachary Pivirotto mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 2-6
L
2025-09-15 · Glen Creek Level Up · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Ehmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2025-08-02 · Glen Creek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hiromi Katayama
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-07-13 · Glen Creek · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 41.5% of games
3.5
80%
32W–8L · 60.7% of games
4.0
45.5%
10W–12L · 50.8% of games
6.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
58.3%
7W–5L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 48.2% of games
9.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 29.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 35% of the time
#1 Singles
35%
40 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
35 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
19 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer