← Search

Ingrid Wecht

Pittsburgh, PA
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
27 matches · 13W–14L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ingrid Wecht to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
W
2026-07-25 · Baby Got Backhand · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · Baby Got Backhand · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Spiess
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-07 · Baby Got Backhand · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Hannah Feldman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-05-30 · Baby Got Backhand · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Rhoads
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2025-06-21 · Baby Got Backhand · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marion Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-06-14 · Baby Got Backhand · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Marion Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
Linda Trevenen / Jane Moose
2024-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Campbell Priemer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-29 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Fran Steger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2023-05-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Christine Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-26 · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2022-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jennifer Waldron
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-6, 1-0
L
2022-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amanda Rhoads
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.9% of games
4.0
37.5%
6W–10L · 45.3% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer