← Search

Graham Rentz

Columbia, SC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
20 matches · 3W–17L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Graham Rentz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history20 matches
L
2026-03-12 · CTL18/Rashley/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Burchstead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-02-19 · CTL18/Rashley/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandre Postic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-12 · CTL18/Rashley/CTFC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Neil Rashley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2024-12-05 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-10-24 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2024-10-17 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Griffin Rentz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2024-10-10 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Lander
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Bruce Honeycutt / Alfred Dion
2024-10-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with McRae Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2024-03-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandre Postic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2024-03-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexandre Postic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-07 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with McRae Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2024-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andy Eckstorm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams1 team
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 levels played
3.5
15%
3W–17L · 34.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
40%
8 matches
#2 Singles
15%
3 matches
#1 Doubles
5%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe