← Search

Cheryl Fuller

Medford, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
57 matches · 29W–28L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cheryl Fuller to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history57 matches
W
N/A
2026-06-14 · ATFC-Whitener · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Gies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-13 · ATFC-Whitener · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Gies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-05-17 · ATFC-Whitener · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Gies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-15 · ATFC-Whitener · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Gies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-10 · ATFC-Whitener · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Gies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · ATFC-Whitener · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Virginia Whitener
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-04-26 · ATFC-Whitener · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Gies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-25 · ATFC-Whitener · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Gies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-08 · ATFC-Whitener · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patricia Schroeder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-19 · ATFC-Whitener · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Gies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-10-19 · ATFC-Whitener · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kari Gies
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-10-18 · ATFC-Whitener · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Seline Pierson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
44%
11W–14L · 51.4% of games
7.0
56.2%
18W–14L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
24 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer