← Search

Maggie Ethier

— year-end
81 matches · 39W–42L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Maggie Ethier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history81 matches
W
2026-08-28 · 4.0 AZCC1 Zup W18Fam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Zupancic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-03 · 4.0 SRP Sauter/Win Thu W18S · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Justin Fejfar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-03-25 · 4.5 ISP Cook W40Sam · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenna Zupancic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
Lisa Joseph / Cynthia Thomas
2026-03-20 · 4.0 SCR Wagner/Oakland W18Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Zupancic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-03-18 · 4.5 ISP Cook W40Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jaime Scanlin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-13 · 4.0 SRP Sauter/Win Thu W18S · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terry Briggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-03-06 · 4.0 SCR Wagner/Oakland W18Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Zupancic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-25 · 4.5 ISP Cook W40Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenna Zupancic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-02-20 · 4.0 SCR Wagner/Oakland W18Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Zupancic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-20 · 4.0 SRP Sauter/Win Thu W18S · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Terry Briggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-18 · 4.5 ISP Cook W40Sam · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenna Zupancic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-06 · 4.0 SCR Wagner/Oakland W18Sam · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Zupancic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Teams20 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
52.6%
30W–27L · 49.3% of games
4.5
38.5%
5W–8L · 45.3% of games
8.5
14.3%
1W–6L · 37.7% of games
4.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
20 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
12 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Singles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova