← Search

Sandy Cathers

— year-end
51 matches · 26W–25L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Sandy Cathers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history51 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaJean Morrow Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-26 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Geer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-23 · Cathers 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-20 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with LaJean Morrow Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-19 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Andree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-16 · Cathers 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-05 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Andree
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · Cathers 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · Rusiewicz 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-08 · Rusiewicz 40s 3.0W Singles Mon PM · #3 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-13 · Cathey/Fields 40s 3.0W Mon PM · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Shannon Hughes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-04-06 · Cathey/Fields 40s 3.0W Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Dagger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Teams48 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
63.2%
12W–7L · 58.1% of games
3.5
35.7%
5W–9L · 44.7% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.8% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
17 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
8 matches
#3 Singles
12%
6 matches
#2 Singles
6%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova