← Search

LaJean Morrow Smith

— year-end
53 matches · 20W–33L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add LaJean Morrow Smith to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandy Cathers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-20 · Pitts 40s 6.5W Combo Thurs PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sandy Cathers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ariel Holtzman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Dagger 18s 6.5W Combo Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Courtney Dagger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-07-08 · Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PM · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-01 · Vannavong 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yacop Touprong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-03 · Bunch 40s 3.5W Singles Wed PM · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-20 · Vannavong 18s 3.5 Mixed Wed PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with William Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-05-04 · Murphy/Fields 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-27 · Murphy/Fields 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Murphy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-21 · Pitts 40s 3.5W Tues PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Veatrice Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-13 · Murphy/Fields 18s 3.5W Mon PM · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Gilmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
Teams25 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
41.4%
12W–17L · 47.5% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.6% of games
6.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 42.6% of games
3.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#1 Singles
8%
4 matches
#2 Singles
4%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer