← Search

Riley Kennedy

— year-end
68 matches · 39W–29L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Riley Kennedy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-09-01 · Vaughn/18/8.5/CWN/XU · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Rodnelle Hadley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-01 · Browne/Drennan · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kathryn Talbot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Mehok/40/DIII/TWN/Stern · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Kate Mehok
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-22 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWD/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paige St. Martin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · Seale/Dodd/18/4.0/MX/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristian Galleguillos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-19 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Aimee Vaughn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · Seale/Dodd/18/4.0/MX/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cristian Galleguillos mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-08 · Seale/Dodd/18/4.0/MX/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lee Blosser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-04 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWN/CP · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lauren Tafaro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · Mehok/40/DIII/TWN/Stern · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Helene Barnett
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-26 · Seale/Tafaro/18/DIII/TWD/CP · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dawn Fowler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-04-09 · Browne-Drennan/40+/4.0/NOD/NOLTC · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
Teams42 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
4.0
55.6%
15W–12L · 56.7% of games
4.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 44.3% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 64.3% of games
4.0mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 43.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#1 Singles
29%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
11 matches
#2 Singles
4%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova