← Search

Emily Adams

Las Vegas, NV
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
355 matches · 243W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Adams to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history355 matches
L
2026-09-02 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brigitte Fallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Meservey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-13 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Geurts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-07-29 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brigitte Fallon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Jim Meservey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-15 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Martz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-17 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kyle Knecht mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-16 · RED ROCK CC · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-10 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sean Amberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · RED ROCK CC · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · SUMMERLIN ARBORS · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kyle Knecht mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
2.5
75%
6W–2L · 61.2% of games
3.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 59.5% of games
3.5
74.1%
20W–7L · 61.7% of games
4.0
82.6%
38W–8L · 66.9% of games
4.5
66.7%
76W–38L · 55.9% of games
5.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 68.9% of games
8.0mixed
65.6%
21W–11L · 55.1% of games
8.5mixed
66.7%
24W–12L · 57.3% of games
9.0mixed
57.6%
34W–25L · 52.6% of games
9.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
111 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
84 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
71 matches
#1 Singles
19%
69 matches
#2 Singles
6%
20 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova