← Search

Jim Meservey

Las Vegas, NV
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
222 matches · 90W–132L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Meservey to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history222 matches
L
2026-08-16 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-26 · RED ROCK CC · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Emily Adams mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-16 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-05-09 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirk Howser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-03 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karin de Amicis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-25 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Roth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-11 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wade Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-28 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Kuhnwald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with William Lucas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-15 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karin de Amicis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-03-14 · RED ROCK CC #2 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Wade Richardson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
3.5
55.1%
38W–31L · 54.4% of games
4.0
28.6%
16W–40L · 40.5% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 37.9% of games
8.0
0%
0W–4L · 18.6% of games
6.0mixed
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.3% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40.6% of games
7.0mixed
31.6%
6W–13L · 44.2% of games
7.5mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.7% of games
8.0mixed
27.3%
6W–16L · 42.6% of games
8.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
60 matches
#1 Doubles
17%
37 matches
#2 Male Doubles
4%
8 matches
#3 Male Doubles
4%
8 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal