← Search

Abby Rogers

Jonesboro, AR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 53W–10L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Abby Rogers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
L
2026-08-26 · Parker/JB/JCC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Parker/JB/JCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · Parker/JB/3OAKS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Playter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · Parker/JB/3OAKS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margo Hafner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-21 · Parker/JB/3OAKS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Maggie Playter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-08 · Parker/JB/3OAKS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margo Hafner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · Cissell/JB/RPCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matt Rankin mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-05-20 · Cissell/JB/RPCC · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dylan Vance mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-21 · Plumlee Team2/MH/LR&F · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with LINDSAY TROTTER
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-04-10 · Plumlee Team2/MH/LR&F · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-10 · Plumlee Team2/MH/LR&F · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mollie Vance
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-06 · Plumlee Team2/MH/LR&F · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
100%
10W–0L · 78.4% of games
3.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 62% of games
4.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 57% of games
6.5
100%
5W–0L · 75.9% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 68.8% of games
3.5mixed
80%
8W–2L · 62.1% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
16 matches
#1 Singles
16%
10 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
8 matches
#2 Singles
5%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert