← Search

Emily Norden

Mercer Island, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
66 matches · 26W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily Norden to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history66 matches
L
2026-04-10 · MI-Condiotty 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mina Laban
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-01 · MI-Condiotty 3.0W · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-25 · MI-Condiotty 3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stephanie Gribble
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 0-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Selamawit Engda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-27 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lori Punke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-31 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Melissa Saelzer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-24 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brandy Nordstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-01-09 · MI-Simply Smashing-Nielsen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2025-04-11 · MI-Laban · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lindsay Goode
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2025-04-01 · MI-Laban · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Moira Franco Krebs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-03-25 · MI-Laban · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michelle Baldwin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2025-02-22 · MI-Mid-Court Crisis-Baldwin · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
2.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 48.2% of games
3.0
36.7%
11W–19L · 42.5% of games
6.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 41.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 29% of the time
#2 Doubles
29%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
18 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
16 matches
#1 Singles
18%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams