← Search

Jacob Dyer

Richmond, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 51W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Jacob Dyer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Westwood ThunderStruck - Mullahy · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jeff Hause
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-31 · Westwood Brickley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dutch Jones
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-24 · Westwood ThunderStruck - Mullahy · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with John Szalay
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Westwood Brickley · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean DiBlasi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Shailesh Khatri championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-08 · Westwood ThunderStruck - Mullahy · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Herrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-02 · Westwood ThunderStruck - Mullahy · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brandon Herrin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Westwood Kelly · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary LaFratta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 3-6
W
2026-06-28 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Gerecke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-24 · Westwood Kelly · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary LaFratta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-20 · Westwood IcyHotz - Nilson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shailesh Khatri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · Westwood - DiBlasi · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Cline
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
80%
4W–1L · 62.4% of games
4.0
52.6%
10W–9L · 52% of games
7.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 52.7% of games
3.5mixed
100%
8W–0L · 67.8% of games
4.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 43% of the time
#2 Doubles
43%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
37%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
13 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams