← Search

Ian Caskill

Crozet, VA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 71W–43L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ian Caskill to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
L
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Charles Friel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
Ho Kim / Ryan Kim
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Rushman Andrews championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-25 · BHSC - Watson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kanwar Singh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with David Harmon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Tieng Nguyen / Quang Nguyen
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with David Harmon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-10 · BHSC - Fairborn · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Suggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · BHSC - Fairborn · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lauren Suggs mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-02 · BHSC - Watson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Thomas Weck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
Anthony Lewis / Samantha Chapman
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Mary Voelmle championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-06-08 · BHSC - Fairborn · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Meredith Mcclellan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-07 · BHSC - Fairborn · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Voelmle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-05-17 · BHSC - Phillips · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Voelmle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
60%
6W–4L · 58.3% of games
4.0
53.8%
14W–12L · 54.3% of games
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 63.1% of games
7.5mixed
66.7%
12W–6L · 61% of games
8.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 57.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
29 matches
#2 Singles
8%
9 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer