← Search

Burak Erdim

Chapel Hill, NC
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 16W–12L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Burak Erdim to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history28 matches
L
2026-07-22 · BBlackburn-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Blackburn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-16 · JByrd-DUR · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-08 · GDichter-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Combs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-30 · BBlackburn-CHTC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Andy Blackburn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-24 · APineda-CHTC · #3 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-24 · GDichter-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · GDichter-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-16 · BBlackburn-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karen Scherr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · APineda-CHTC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-10 · GDichter-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Richard Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · APineda-CHTC · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-06-03 · GDichter-CHTC · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Matthew Curry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
57.1%
4W–3L · 54.3% of games
4.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 59.1% of games
4.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#3 Singles
14%
4 matches
#1 Singles
7%
2 matches
#2 Singles
7%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal