← Search

Jeff Reedy

Durham, NC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
133 matches · 65W–68L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jeff Reedy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history133 matches
W
2026-09-02 · ELindblom-DUR · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dave Michelman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-30 · JMontague.40.7.5C-CCC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Arash Chehrazi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-19 · ELindblom-DUR · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Vincent Illiano
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-10 · JMontague.40.7.5C-CCC · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Will Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-07-21 · KLeib-CCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lynda Noga mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-14 · KLeib-CCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Elder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-30 · KLeib-CCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Reedy mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-23 · KLeib-CCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tammy Sasser mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-26 · KLeib-CCC · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Montague mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · ELindblom-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Roessler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
N/A
2026-02-28 · ELindblom-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Philip Sweigart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-02-21 · ELindblom-DUR · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 51.2% of games
3.5
100%
5W–0L · 70.1% of games
4.0
48.6%
17W–18L · 52.3% of games
7.5
38.1%
8W–13L · 47% of games
4.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 38.6% of games
7.0mixed
60%
12W–8L · 53.3% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–4L · 40% of games
8.0mixed
27.8%
5W–13L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
45 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
29 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer