← Search

Deborah Brown

Statham, GA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
60 matches · 23W–37L · seasons 2024–2027

Captains: add Deborah Brown to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history60 matches
W
2026-09-13 · TGC/Rittenger · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tasha Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-07-09 · GA Club/Brown Combo · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Gigi Dykes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-04-13 · TGC/Brown · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 6-3
L
2026-03-30 · TGC/Brown · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lynn Baginski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-24 · The GA Club/Bahnsen/Bennett · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Pickering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-03-23 · TGC/Brown · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carolyn Brandwein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-03-20 · TGC/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tasha Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-03-10 · The GA Club/Bahnsen/Bennett · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chris Brandt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 6-3
W
2026-02-27 · TGC/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Tasha Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-02-13 · TGC/Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Anders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-01-30 · TGC/Kennedy · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Tillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-23 · TGC/Kennedy · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacy Anders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 44.3% of games
3.0
41.7%
10W–14L · 48.8% of games
3.5
35.5%
11W–20L · 44.8% of games
6.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
17 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
14 matches
#4 Doubles
22%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams