← Search

Brandy Chandler

Bogart, GA
2.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
53 matches · 35W–18L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Brandy Chandler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history53 matches
L
Brittany Johnson / Angela Smith
2026-08-12 · ATC - Donatelli · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kasey Dillard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-09 · OVP Dean 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Wozniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · OVP Dean 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Layla Peacock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-25 · OVP Dean 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Wozniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · OVP/Dean (MXD 3.0) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Josh Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-07-20 · OVP/Dean (MXD 3.0) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Josh Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
Laura Williams / Emily Bahnsen
2026-07-19 · OVP Dean 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kristin Wozniak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · ATC - Donatelli · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kasey Dillard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-21 · OVP Dean 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Layla Peacock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · OVP Dean 6.5 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Layla Peacock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · ATC - Donatelli · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Kasey Dillard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-08 · OVP/Dean (MXD 3.0) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Josh Chandler mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
53.3%
8W–7L · 52% of games
3.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 59.9% of games
5.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.2% of games
6.5
50%
3W–3L · 58.3% of games
3.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 73.1% of games
5.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games
6.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 38% of the time
#3 Doubles
38%
20 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
13%
7 matches
#1 Singles
6%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova