← Search

Emily von Stuckrad-Smolinski

Dayton, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 135W–103L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Emily von Stuckrad-Smolinski to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
L
2026-08-16 · QRRC-Sommerfeldt · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Taphorn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · KTC-Weaver · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ed Pearson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-09 · QRRC-Sommerfeldt · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kristin Taphorn
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · KTC-Buerschen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maggie Leadman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-18 · KTC-Buerschen · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Georgianne Lowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2025-12-05 · KTC Weaver · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Donald Nguyen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-12-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Shively
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-4, 0-1
W
2025-12-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Metzcar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-11-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronit Thomeczek
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-27 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-23 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Georgianne Lowman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nina Spitler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams75 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
100%
6W–0L · 73% of games
3.0
66%
35W–18L · 56.7% of games
3.5
56.3%
40W–31L · 53.3% of games
4.0
24.1%
7W–22L · 40% of games
6.5
62.5%
10W–6L · 54.3% of games
7.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 39.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.8% of games
7.0mixed
65.7%
23W–12L · 54.1% of games
8.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 27% of the time
#2 Doubles
27%
63 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
60 matches
#1 Singles
12%
29 matches
#2 Singles
8%
19 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer