← Search

Patricia Gilmore

— year-end
352 matches · 226W–126L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Patricia Gilmore to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history352 matches
W
2026-07-18 · QRRC-Crespo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kirsten Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-11 · QRRC-Crespo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Johannes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-07-09 · KTC-Whiting · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sonja Johannes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-07 · SRTC-Tabrah · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Renuka Dewan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-16 · SRTC-Tabrah · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sonja Johannes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-13 · QRRC-Crespo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Gretchen Trubee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · KTC-Whiting · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sonja Johannes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-06 · QRRC-Crespo · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Johannes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · QRRC-Crespo · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Johannes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-14 · SRTC-Tabrah · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Johannes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-07 · SRTC-Tabrah · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sonja Johannes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-03 · SRTC/STC-Tabrah/Enslen · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Samantha Enslen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Teams82 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
4.0
81.2%
91W–21L · 61.9% of games
4.5
47.2%
34W–38L · 48.1% of games
5.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
8.0
81%
47W–11L · 65.1% of games
8.5
45.5%
10W–12L · 49% of games
9.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 44.5% of games
7.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 62.8% of games
8.0mixed
54.8%
23W–19L · 51.3% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
179 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
109 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
58 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova