← Search

Judith Bertran

Gainesville, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
264 matches · 191W–73L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Judith Bertran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history264 matches
L
2026-08-08 · FK/The Breakers-Barlet · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Yonge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-27 · #3 Doubles · with Sharon Christie Ybanez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-26 · #4 Doubles · with Sharon Christie Ybanez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · with Ashley Spink championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-25 · #3 Doubles · with Heather Adkins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
Lauren Clark
2026-07-25 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-07-23 · DB/Justis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dan Harloff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-19 · FK/The Breakers-Barlet · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ronald Wiese mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · FK/The Breakers-Barlet · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Yonge mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-14 · Alachua/Spink · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Spink
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · Alachua/Spink · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Christie Ybanez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-3
W
2026-06-04 · Alachua/Spink · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Christie Ybanez
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams59 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
100%
11W–0L · 71.1% of games
2.5
85.7%
6W–1L · 65.8% of games
3.0
76.5%
26W–8L · 59.7% of games
3.5
75%
45W–15L · 58.3% of games
4.0
75%
9W–3L · 58.5% of games
5.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 62.4% of games
6.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 53.3% of games
6.5
70.8%
17W–7L · 57.3% of games
7.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.7% of games
7.5
72.7%
8W–3L · 62.7% of games
2.5mixed
85.7%
6W–1L · 63.6% of games
6.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 56.1% of games
7.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 48% of games
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 25% of the time
#1 Singles
25%
66 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
48 matches
#2 Singles
7%
19 matches
#1 Female Doubles
4%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova