← Search

Dan Harloff

Gainesville, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
138 matches · 100W–38L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Dan Harloff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history138 matches
W
2026-08-23 · DB/Justis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Garcia-Crespo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-13 · DB/Justis · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ashley Spink mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Enrique Vargas championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · with Pranav Gupta championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-23 · DB/Justis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judith Bertran mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-12 · DB/Justis · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Garcia-Crespo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-11 · 300 Club Wimsett/Harloff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lawrence Hooghuis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · 300 Club Wimsett/Harloff · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Cianci
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · 300 Club Wimsett/Harloff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Scott Wright
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-14 · 300 Club Wimsett/Harloff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pranav Gupta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-07 · 300 Club Wimsett/Harloff · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pranav Gupta
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-23 · 300 Club Wimsett/Harloff · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Steven Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 35.6% of games
2.5
100%
8W–0L · 64.1% of games
3.0
70.4%
19W–8L · 62.9% of games
3.5
70%
7W–3L · 58.8% of games
5.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 65.7% of games
6.5
70%
7W–3L · 58.5% of games
6.0mixed
89.5%
17W–2L · 68.2% of games
7.0mixed
76.2%
16W–5L · 61.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 31% of the time
#2 Doubles
31%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
38 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
36 matches
#1 Singles
9%
12 matches
#1 Male Singles
7%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe