← Search

Christeena Sevy

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
196 matches · 101W–95L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christeena Sevy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history196 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Until Smooth · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carter Anderson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-28 · Until Smooth · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Cook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Until Smooth · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Veeresh Math mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-17 · Until Smooth · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Cook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-10 · Until Smooth · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Cook mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-18 · Nothing But Love youngsters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kylie Nesbit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-06-15 · Love All · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jo Roby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-06-11 · Nothing But Love youngsters · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kylie Nesbit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · Love All · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kylie Nesbit
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-06-08 · Love All · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jo Roby
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-04 · Nothing But Love youngsters · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Donna Moussalli
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · Love All · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jean Nielsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
50%
4W–4L · 54% of games
3.5
56.1%
37W–29L · 53.3% of games
4.0
34.8%
8W–15L · 46.2% of games
6.0
60%
3W–2L · 51.7% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 53.8% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.4% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
20W–10L · 55.7% of games
7.5mixed
50%
17W–17L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
41 matches
#1 Singles
15%
30 matches
#2 Singles
5%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer