← Search

Amy Barger

Columbus, OH
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
109 matches · 58W–51L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Amy Barger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history109 matches
W
2026-09-11 · The Players' Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Metta McCoy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-5, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · The Players Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathryn Campbell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-10 · The Players Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Meredith Hulse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-06 · The Players Club 2 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katie Druhan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-03-30 · The Players Club 2 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jenny McKenna
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-11-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Natalie Knezevic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-31 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jill Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-27 · The Players Club · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Lindstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2025-10-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-10-13 · The Players Club · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laura Ubert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Turner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-09-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Jerman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
3W–3L · 51.3% of games
3.0
61.6%
45W–28L · 51.3% of games
3.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 35.5% of games
5.5
50%
2W–2L · 50% of games
6.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 45.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 30% of the time
#3 Doubles
30%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
27 matches
#1 Singles
9%
10 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe