← Search

Christina Kulesa

Lewis Center, OH
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
313 matches · 188W–125L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Christina Kulesa to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history313 matches
L
2026-07-29 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Edwards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 5-7, 0-1
W
Allison Tice / Jana Tice
2026-07-13 · Wickertree 3 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Edwards
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Minadeo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
Pei-An Chao / Sylvie Lederer
2026-06-03 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Minadeo
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 5-6
W
2026-05-18 · Wickertree 1 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Midge Taylor
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-05-08 · Wickertree 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eileen Pewitt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
W
2026-05-03 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Willmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-04-24 · Wickertree 2 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-19 · Wickertree 3 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Theresa Donahue
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-04-17 · Wickertree 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pamela Miller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-10 · Wickertree 2 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · Wickertree 3 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kelly Willmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
66.3%
130W–66L · 56.9% of games
3.5
47.2%
42W–47L · 49.2% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 69.1% of games
6.5
60%
9W–6L · 55.1% of games
7.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 55% of the time
#1 Doubles
55%
171 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
54 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
46 matches
#2 Singles
11%
33 matches
#1 Singles
3%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal