← Search

Heather Ross

Oklahoma City, OK
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
145 matches · 80W–65L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Heather Ross to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history145 matches
L
2026-09-02 · Match Point Mamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lenice Cattley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-05 · Bogert · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Kathryn Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · Bogert · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Manar Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-09 · Match Point Mamas · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-03 · Betty's · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Seda Bakir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-01 · Match Point Mamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seda Bakir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-05-18 · Match Point Mamas · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-15 · OKC Day/Miss Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seda Bakir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-05-11 · Match Point Mamas · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lee Anne Stone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-08 · OKC Day/Miss Hits · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seda Bakir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-04-29 · Betty's · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
Lawre Everest / Melissa Smith
2026-04-24 · OKC Day/Miss Hits · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Seda Bakir
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
25%
1W–3L · 51.8% of games
3.0
60.4%
29W–19L · 54% of games
3.5
62.1%
41W–25L · 53.4% of games
4.0
12.5%
2W–14L · 34.3% of games
8.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 51.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 31% of the time
#1 Doubles
31%
45 matches
#1 Singles
26%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
22 matches
#2 Singles
6%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer