← Search

Manar Landis

— year-end
108 matches · 69W–39L · seasons 2021–2027

Captains: add Manar Landis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Volleys & Vibes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kaitlyn Browning
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-13 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brooke Bogert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-07-08 · Bogert · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Heather Ross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-06 · Bogert · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bethany Neighbors
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-22 · Volleys and Vibes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · Volleys and Vibes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ashley Vignola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-01 · Volleys and Vibes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kimberly Fox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-11 · Volleys and Vibes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jackie Tiehen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-03 · Team Beast 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joshua Landis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-27 · Volleys and Vibes · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-13 · Volleys and Vibes · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Barbara Black
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
Teams34 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 43% of games
3.0
80.6%
29W–7L · 59.2% of games
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 60.3% of games
4.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 46.4% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
53.3%
8W–7L · 49.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
22 matches
#1 Singles
19%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
18 matches
#2 Singles
9%
10 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova