← Search

Nancy Sicairos

Leesburg, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
442 matches · 367W–75L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Nancy Sicairos to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history442 matches
W
2026-08-22 · ACOSTA - High Rollers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Laith Peter mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
N/A
2026-08-04 · Green/Sicairos - Good Good Girls · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shruti Srinivasan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-02 · ACOSTA - High Rollers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · ACOSTA - High Rollers · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ben Jackson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-14 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-5
L
2026-06-07 · Team 2 The Ringers · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-3
L
2026-06-04 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hana Freymiller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-04 · Team 1 The Roland Girlos · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ronda Estridge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-5
W
2026-05-15 · Team 2 Spring Chicks · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-05-09 · Cedar Sprint · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-08 · Team 2 Spring Chicks · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Erin Green
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-04-25 · #3 Doubles · with Cathleen Porter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams108 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level16 levels played
2.5
85.7%
24W–4L · 69.5% of games
3.0
91.8%
67W–6L · 72.6% of games
3.5
88.5%
85W–11L · 70.3% of games
4.0
83.3%
25W–5L · 60.2% of games
4.5
52.5%
21W–19L · 54.7% of games
5.5
100%
5W–0L · 76.9% of games
6.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 70.7% of games
7.5
90.9%
10W–1L · 69.3% of games
8.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 69.8% of games
3.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 66.7% of games
7.0mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 63.4% of games
7.5mixed
80%
4W–1L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 61.2% of games
8.5mixed
100%
4W–0L · 70.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
177 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
109 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
91 matches
#1 Singles
11%
48 matches
#2 Singles
3%
11 matches
#3 Singles
1%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer