← Search

Moo Hackett

Aldie, VA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 91W–79L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Moo Hackett to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
Beth Gardner
2026-07-11 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
Ye Hu / Cindy Pham
2026-07-11 · #3 Doubles · with Grete Bravo championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-06-10 · Team 1 Coleman · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-05-15 · Team 1 Coleman · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Laurie Cohen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
Kerrie Jenkins / Brita Robinson
2025-08-26 · Pongsugree - TRI4FUN- 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Vanessa Ogilvie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
L
2025-08-05 · Pongsugree - TRI4FUN- 4.5 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Beets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-07-18 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 1-5
L
2025-06-21 · Team 5 BABs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Stoltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-4
W
N/A
2025-06-04 · Team 2 Fireball · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
Nancy Sicairos / Erin Green
2025-06-03 · Team 2 Fireball · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jessica Coleman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
Anais Deerman / Cindy Pham
2025-06-01 · Team 5 BABs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Colleen Stoltz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-18 · Team 5 BABs · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jennifer Beets
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
61.4%
27W–17L · 54.4% of games
4.0
55.1%
38W–31L · 50.8% of games
4.5
52%
13W–12L · 52.5% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 50.4% of games
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 21% of the time
#1 Singles
21%
36 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
34 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#2 Singles
16%
27 matches
#3 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert