Dana Charette
Cos Cob, CT
153 matches · 109W–44L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Dana Charette to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history153 matches
L
Miriam Gardner / Randa Sauerborn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
Jennifer Sheehy / Kristen Laitin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L
Chizuru Asakura / Mira Schirripa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2027
GRC:3.5 Greenwich Racquet Club:Leon/Charette
Greenwich Racquet Club 18+ 3.5
Greenwich Racquet Club 4.0 Fall
GRC: 4.0 18 :Leon/Zaminski
GRC: Greenwich Racquet Club: Leon/Charette
GRC:3.5:Leon/Charette
Greenwich Racquet Club
Greenwich Racquet Club
Greenwich Racquet Club
Greenwich Racquet Club
OGTA:No Unforced Heiress:Matusow/Auch
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
76.7%
33W–10L · 66.2% of games
3.5
73.2%
60W–22L · 58.9% of games
4.0
53.8%
7W–6L · 50.4% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
50 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
40 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
4 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.