Lisa Sippel
128 matches · 71W–57L · seasons 2019–2026
Captains: add Lisa Sippel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.
Match history128 matches
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
Amanda Barrow / Shannon Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
58.1%
68W–49L · 52.3% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
39 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
33 matches
#1 Singles
5%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.