← Search

Teresa Reed

— year-end
149 matches · 91W–58L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Teresa Reed to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Moseley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sara Litton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-09 · Rocconi CCC · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with ELIZABETH STALLWORTH
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-09-08 · Joel CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chloe Darden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-31 · Rocconi CCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Presley Roberson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-30 · Joel CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maghan Ashmore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Joel CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chloe Darden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Anne Bailey Jernigan / Ashley Brown
2026-08-19 · Rocconi CCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Presley Roberson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-18 · Joel CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robin Toler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-17 · Rocconi CCC · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Presley Roberson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-11 · Lusk-CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Belenchia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-23 · Davidson CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Wicker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-20 · Davidson CCC · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Megan Wicker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
Teams63 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
80%
12W–3L · 59.5% of games
3.0
75.5%
37W–12L · 59.9% of games
3.5
31%
9W–20L · 39.3% of games
5.5
64.3%
9W–5L · 55.2% of games
6.5
65.5%
19W–10L · 56% of games
7.5
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 50% of games
3.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
41 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
35 matches
#1 Singles
6%
9 matches
#3 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams