← Search

Sara Litton

— year-end
41 matches · 22W–19L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Sara Litton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history41 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Moseley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Teresa Reed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-08 · Moseley-CCC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Maribeth Crews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-12 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Blair Campbell Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-22 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emily Phillips
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
W
2025-10-16 · Haynes-Bearpen · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Caroline Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-10-08 · Moseley-CCC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Megan Wicker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-28 · Haynes-Bearpen · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holly Wells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-08-24 · Moseley-CCC · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christie Sledge
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2025-05-04 · Boykin-CCC · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-16 · Boykin-CCC · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stephanie Farris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2024-10-29 · Haynes-Bearpen · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
Teams23 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.8% of games
3.0
80%
12W–3L · 65.2% of games
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 46.4% of games
6.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
15 matches
#2 Singles
12%
5 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
4 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert