← Search

Maureen McElrone

Lancaster, PA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
179 matches · 70W–109L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Maureen McElrone to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history179 matches
L
2026-09-13 · Hempfield - Strange/Walden · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Catherine Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-06 · Hempfield - Hufnagel · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Apetrior
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-23 · RCW - Scott · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tina Loose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · RCW - Scott · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Stacy Gould
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · RCW - Mowrer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kathy Mowrer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · RCW - Mowrer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audrey Lubas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-12 · RCW - Mowrer · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Audrey Lubas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-12 · (CPD) RCW - Sambrick · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Doreen Fulmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-10 · (CPD) RCW - Sambrick · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Courtney Longenecker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-30 · Hempfield - Hufnagel · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Catherine Hill
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-28 · RCW - Mowrer · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-15 · RCW - Mowrer · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Beth Apetrior
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
31.1%
19W–42L · 44.2% of games
4.5
20%
3W–12L · 36.8% of games
8.0
50%
7W–7L · 46.6% of games
7.0mixed
41.9%
18W–25L · 48.6% of games
8.0mixed
28.6%
6W–15L · 49.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
61 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
53 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer