← Search

Dana Delvescovo

Gulfport, MS
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 36W–50L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Dana Delvescovo to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
Stephanie Chapman / Katy Boyer
2026-08-18 · BBTC-Creel · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Linda Creel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-02 · BBTC Knight 40+3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony Delvescovo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
Lisa Chapman / John Cleary
2026-06-23 · 55+ Mixed 3.0 Biloxi- MacNaughton · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony Delvescovo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-09 · BBTC Knight 40+3.0 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anthony Delvescovo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-04-28 · BBTC - Brehm 18's · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Pam Berdine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-04-27 · BBTC-Creel · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Linda Creel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-04-07 · BBTC - Brehm 18's · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Bridget Weatherly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-06 · Pass Christian - Bourdin · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Bourdin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-01 · Pass Christian - Bourdin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jo Ann Lozes
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-19 · BBTC - Brehm 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pam Berdine
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-17 · BBTC - Brehm 18's · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Hebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-03-11 · Pass Christian - Bourdin · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Michele Gargiulo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
84.6%
11W–2L · 61.3% of games
3.0
23.3%
10W–33L · 41.8% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
5.5
44.4%
4W–5L · 45.9% of games
6.5
75%
3W–1L · 59.4% of games
2.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 41% of the time
#3 Doubles
41%
35 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
5%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer