← Search

Pam Berdine

— year-end
102 matches · 32W–70L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Pam Berdine to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history102 matches
L
2026-09-08 · BBTC Knight · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marlo Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · BBTC-MATTHEWS 6.5 WOMEN · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Gillenwater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · BBTC Knight · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Marlo Stewart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-05 · Gargiulo 55+ 6.5 Combo BBTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Melissa Rumsey
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-08-04 · BBTC-MATTHEWS 6.5 WOMEN · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Gargiulo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · Gargiulo 55+ 6.5 Combo BBTC · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Robin Mitterer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-18 · BBTC - Brehm 40+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Brehm
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-04 · BBTC - Brehm 18's · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lynn Hebert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-04-28 · BBTC - Brehm 18's · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Dana Delvescovo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
Cindy Johnson / Ann Guice
2026-04-13 · BBTC - Brehm 40+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsey Byrd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-04-08 · BBTC - Brehm 40+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Knight
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-01 · BBTC - Brehm 18's · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jami Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
Teams28 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
2.5
36.8%
7W–12L · 41.5% of games
3.0
23.8%
10W–32L · 40.9% of games
3.5
18.2%
2W–9L · 30.8% of games
5.5
50%
4W–4L · 47.4% of games
6.5
0%
0W–4L · 31.4% of games
2.5mixed
50%
6W–6L · 49.5% of games
3.0mixed
50%
3W–3L · 48.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
32 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
19 matches
#1 Singles
10%
10 matches
#2 Singles
4%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal