← Search

Kristina Hanley

— year-end
208 matches · 123W–85L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Kristina Hanley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history208 matches
L
2026-06-24 · White/Hardebeck · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-03 · White/Hardebeck · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-19 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lucy Klingler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-04-16 · Uelhof · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Samantha Politte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-15 · Uelhof (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Sneed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-01 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shannon Lemp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-25 · Uelhof (SD) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristina Reilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-02-22 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-11 · Uelhof (SD) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Cazar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-02-08 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-02-04 · Uelhof (SD) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-02-01 · Hardebeck/White (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
Teams44 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
2.5
100%
5W–0L · 79.7% of games
3.0
75%
33W–11L · 60% of games
3.5
52.8%
76W–68L · 52.5% of games
7.0
60%
9W–6L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
92 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
74 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
33 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert