← Search

Cathy Kabbe

Saint Louis, MO
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 60W–37L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Cathy Kabbe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
L
2026-06-10 · AuBuchon/Johnson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Schwesig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-03 · AuBuchon/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-27 · AuBuchon/Johnson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nancy Tulloch
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-19 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-29 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-22 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-15 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Schwesig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-07 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-03-01 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Denise Foley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-02-22 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sandra Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-02-08 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Jensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-02-01 · Johnson/Blades (S) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Maria Blades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.0
71.9%
41W–16L · 61.1% of games
3.5
47.5%
19W–21L · 50.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 23% of the time
#2 Doubles
23%
22 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
20 matches
#1 Singles
19%
18 matches
#2 Singles
17%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
16 matches
#4 Doubles
5%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova