← Search

Amanda Hilton

Waukee, IA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 60W–25L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Amanda Hilton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-05-30 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Trinh Le-Coulter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-03 · Whipp · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nathan Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
Adam Rothert / Tiffany Lavastida
2026-04-26 · Whipp · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nathan Johnston mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-04-25 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-04-10 · IA/Pham-Shipp/18&Over4.0W · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Anne Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2025-11-23 · Whipp/Pham · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nathan Greiner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
Jennifer Smith / Jessica Stewart
2025-11-01 · Shipp & Pham: Life Time · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Korri ClarkWilt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
Becky Flander / Rebecca Studer
2025-10-04 · Shipp & Pham: Life Time · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Korri ClarkWilt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2025-09-28 · Whipp/Pham · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Nathan Greiner mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-09-13 · Shipp & Pham: Life Time · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Leslie Shipp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-07-13 · Smith - Southwoods · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenn Willis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-06-29 · Smith - Southwoods · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Greta Rath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
83.3%
5W–1L · 67% of games
3.0
75%
3W–1L · 58.6% of games
3.5
85%
17W–3L · 63.8% of games
4.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 46.9% of games
6.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.7% of games
8.0mixed
90.5%
19W–2L · 69.4% of games
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 41.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
25 matches
#1 Singles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal