← Search

James Veninger

North Truro, MA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
177 matches · 141W–36L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add James Veninger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history177 matches
W
2026-06-23 · WIL:SummerHerons:Sicinski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Haynes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-04-11 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & Kaump · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Kaump mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-04-07 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & Kaump · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Kaump mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
W
Merri Wells / Jed Macy
2026-04-06 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Pronenko & Kaump · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Kaump mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-12-13 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-12-07 · MCAC:Lobstahs:Weinman:Craig · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Craig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2025-11-16 · MCAC:Lobstahs:Weinman:Craig · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Craig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-15 · MCAC:Veninger · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jonathan Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
2025-11-08 · MCAC:Veninger · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Peter Weinman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-5
W
2025-11-02 · MCAC:Lobstahs:Weinman:Craig · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jane Craig mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
W
2025-11-02 · WIL:SummerHerons:Sicinski · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Haynes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-0
W
2025-07-01 · SYTC:Bernstein:Sicinski · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Haynes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 52.7% of games
8.0
83.3%
50W–10L · 62% of games
7.0mixed
87.7%
50W–7L · 62.6% of games
8.0mixed
69.8%
37W–16L · 56.3% of games
9.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 56% of the time
#1 Doubles
56%
99 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams