← Search

Jeremy Deans

Hattiesburg, MS
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
44 matches · 21W–23L · seasons 2024–2026

Captains: add Jeremy Deans to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history44 matches
L
2026-08-16 · Hall - 6.5 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Shea Malone
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-03 · Boykin 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-04-02 · Boykin 3.5 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alen Hajnal
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-28 · Deans-3.0M-PB · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-02-22 · Boykin 3.5 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Will Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-12-09 · The Elevennis Players · #2 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2025-12-01 · The Elevennis Players · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2025-10-07 · Roseberry-6.5-Tatum · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ethan Moore
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
Eric Benson / David Williams
2025-10-01 · Boykin 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Alfonso Preziosi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2025-09-02 · Roseberry-6.5-Tatum · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Reagan Roseberry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2025-08-31 · Boykin 6.5 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ricky Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-08-24 · Roseberry-6.5-Tatum · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tanner Gilliland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
68.8%
11W–5L · 64% of games
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 37.4% of games
5.5
100%
4W–0L · 61.7% of games
6.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 42% of games
3.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
13 matches
#1 Singles
16%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
6 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal